News

UNESCO builds an international policy agenda for digital preservation of documentary heritage

Four key policy priorities for digital preservation came to the fore during a virtual policy dialogue organized by UNESCO鈥檚 Memory of the World Programme to draw attention to documentary heritage at risk. These included:

Protecting cultural identity at risk
Creating sustainable partnerships for preservation
Preventing loss of documentary heritage due to the rapid obsolescence of technology
Upholding enabling legal frameworks for effective functioning of memory institutions

Held on 27 October 2020, the event brought together an international line-up of experts and practitioners to analyse policy gaps and possible solutions in digital preservation. Over 800 participants joined the event via ZOOM and YouTube from all over the world. The event was split in two sessions to accommodate an international audience across different time zones.
REVISIT THE POLICY DIALOGUE

UNESCO鈥檚 Deputy Director-General, Xing Qu, opened the event by underlining the fundamental significance of archival records, and UNESCO鈥檚 commitment to ensuring the preservation of and access to the world鈥檚 documentary heritage.

There is no history 鈥 no interrogation of the past by the present 鈥 without archives. Without archives, there is no memory, justice or reconciliation.
Xing Qu, UNESCO鈥檚 Deputy Director-General

In his keynote speech, David Fricker, the President of the International Council on Archives and Member of the MoW International Advisory Committee, reiterated the importance of digital preservation and singled out a number of 鈥渕egatrends鈥 which, if left untreated, could have grave implications for the future of memory institutions and documentary heritage as a whole.

Fricker highlighted the increasing spread of disinformation, short technology cycles, a blurring of traditional and non-traditional institutions as keepers of documentary heritage and the impact of natural and man-made disasters. These themes formed the context for discussing a digital preservation agenda from the perspective of cultural identity at risk, sustainability, technology and legal frameworks. 

 

Below are the key takeaways from each dialogue session.

Cultural identity at risk

Presenter: Ms Reena Tiwari, Curtin University, Australia
Dialogue contributors: Ms Te Paea Paringatai, Library Manager, the University of Canterbury, New Zealand; Abdullah bin Salim bin Saeed Al-Hinai, Acting Head of the Reference Department at the Medical Library, Oman
Moderator: Ms Shubha Chaudhuri, Director of the Archives and Research Centre for Ethnomusicology, India

 

  • It is paramount to recognise intangible cultural elements 鈥 stories and memories 鈥 as heritage. However, if not done correctly, this could potentially lead to the distortion of cultural elements and their place of origin. Questions around management and ownership of digitally preserved cultural heritage, its access and control are critical.
  • To balance the velocity, volume, veracity and variety of data that derives from indigenous people, and that is captured by non-indigenous memory institutions, appropriate indigenous data governance fit for purpose models must be developed and implemented to successfully enable effective indigenous data sovereignty.

Sustainability


Presenters: Mr Jeffrey van der Hoeven, National Library of the Netherlands; Ms Marcie Hopkins, British Library, United Kingdom
Dialogue contributors: Mr Gabriel Bunmi Alegbeleye, University of Ibadan, Nigeria; Ms Laila Hussein Moustafa, University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign, United States of America; Team ANRI (Mr Adhie Gesit Pambudi, Mr Dhani Sugiharto and Mr Prasetyo Utomo), National Archives of the Republic of Indonesia
Moderator: Mr Robert Buckley, Technical Adviser at the National Archives of the United Arab Emirates

 

  • Sustainability is not a technological challenge but an organisational one. Given the volume and diversity of digital collections which are becoming the most prominent reflection of heritage in the modern world, a paradigm shift from institutional thinking towards organisational networks is needed. These networks share knowledge and services from which they can all benefit.
  • Sustainability means being open to ongoing transformational activity. Through collaborative partnerships, organisations can learn to adapt, grow and innovate to achieve long-lasting and positive change. A focus on people at the heart of institutional collaborations is essential to ensuring sustainable and thriving partnerships in the long-term.

Technology


Presenters: Mr G眉nther Cyranek and Mr Felix Gross, Archive Digitalization, Cyranek ICT4D, Germany; Mr Dietrich Sch眉ller, Preservation Sub-Committee of the UNESCO MoW International Advisory Committee
Dialogue contributors: Ms Yolia Tortolero Cervantes, Independent Consultant, Mexico; Ms Amanda Harris, Director of the PARADISEC Sydney Unit, Sydney Conservatorium of Music, Australia; Mr Fr茅d茅ric Marie, President of FIAF, Director of the Cin茅math猫que Suisse, Switzerland
Moderator: Mr Robert Buckley, Technical Adviser at the National Archives of the United Arab Emirates

 

  • It is important to facilitate affordable digitization to avoid costly outsourcing solutions. Digitizing with full-chip cameras offers professional standards for different formats, such as photos, slides, posters, negative on glass, books, posters, etc. A special Massive Open Online Course (MOOC) can be developed for memory institutions to enhance their in-house capacity for both digitization processes and the design of web presence of digitized collections.
  • Magnetic tape recordings, which are the primary sources of our knowledge about the world鈥檚 cultural and linguistic diversity, risk disappearing forever. They can only be safeguarded by digital content migration 鈥 separating contents from the original, albeit obsolete carriers, and transferring them to safe digital repositories. For this, the availability of required equipment is key. The number of machines for the variety of magnetic tape formats is rapidly shrinking: 2025 is widely assumed to be the point beyond which a regular transfer of magnetic tape contents to digital repositories will become impossible. Audio-visual archives require more financial resources and capacity-building to achieve this in time.