Treaty for the Prohibition of Nuclear Weapons in Latin America and the Caribbean (Treaty of Tlatelolco), 1967

Related Documents
The Treaty for the Prohibition of Nuclear Weapons in Latin America and the Caribbean (Treaty of Tlatelolco, 1967) is one of the most important contributions of Mexican diplomacy. Alfonso GarcÃa Robles, 1982 Nobel Peace Prize winner, was at the forefront of the negotiations of this great contribution to international security in the midst of one of the most critical moments of the Cold War. After the missile crisis in Cuba, it confirmed the pacifism of Latin America and the Caribbean, at a time of great challenges and difficulties due to the arms race of the great powers.
The fifty years of the signing of the Treaty of Tlatelolco (on February 14, 2017) is an invaluable opportunity to remind contemporary international society of Mexico's relentless effort to raise new awareness on the still latent and relevant threat posed by nuclear weapons.
The Treaty established the first nuclear-weapon-free-zone in a densely populated area of the planet, and continues to be an example for the establishment of five additional denuclearized zones. Its adoption preceded the adoption of the Treaty for the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons (NPT). Thirty-three States of the region are party to this legal instrument that obliges them to prohibit the production, acquisition, testing and deployment of nuclear weapons in the Zone of Application defined in its article 4, which covers the territory of the 33 countries of the region and the adjacent areas of territorial sea.
Risks encountered
Environmental issues
Identified risks | Level of risk |
---|---|
Moisture | Moderate |
Temperature | Moderate |
Light (visible light, ultraviolet radiation, etc.) | Low |
Dust | Low |
Pollution | Low |
Pests (rodents, animals, insects, etc.) | None |
Microorganisms (bacteria, mould, etc.) | None |
Management or organizational issues
Identified risks | Level of risk |
---|---|
Lack of maintenance, including cleaning | Low |
Inadequate building | Low |
Building with structural damage | None |
Lack of an adequate warehouse | None |
Lack of boxes and/or archive materials | None |
Lack of human resources | None |
Lack of security measures | None |
Insufficient budget to operate | None |
Natural disaster risks
Identified risks | Level of risk |
---|---|
Fires | Low |
Rains | None |
Mudslides or landslides | None |
Floods | None |
Hurricanes, cyclones, storms | None |
Earthquakes | Moderate |
Tsunamis | None |
Volcanic eruptions | None |
Temperature increase | Moderate |
Political and/or social risks
Identified risks | Level of risk |
---|---|
Armed conflicts | None |
Illegal trafficking of documents | None |
Thefts or robberies | None |
Vandalism | None |
Threatening socio-cultural environment | None |
Lack of support/public policies | None |
Environment (location) issues
Identified risks | Level of risk |
---|---|
Material/storage units | None |
Furniture | None |
Room or warehouse | None |
Building | Low |
Site or neighbourhood | Low |
Area or region, beyond the neighbourhood | None |
Indicators
Identified risks | |
---|---|
Management Plan | No |
Response Protocol | Partially |
Documentary heritage digitization | Yes, completely |
Documentary heritage availability on the internet | No, but we are planning it |